Junctional Adhesion Molecule A (JAM-A) is definitely a member of the

Junctional Adhesion Molecule A (JAM-A) is definitely a member of the Ig superfamily of membrane proteins expressed in platelets, leukocytes, endothelial cells and epithelial cells. process of tumor cell metastasis.20 However, little is known about JAM-A’s part in cancer progression. We recently found that JAM-A is definitely indicated in breast tumor cells and cell lines.21 Based on our studies with endothelial cells it was felt that JAM-A expression in breast cancer cells may also enhance the migratory ability of these cells. Surprisingly, we found an inverse relation between the expression of JAM-A and the metastatic ability Apremilast of breast cancer cells. T47D cells, which express high levels of JAM-A, are the least migratory; whereas MDA-MB-231 cells, which are highly migratory, are found to express the least amount of JAM-A.21 We also found that overexpression of JAM-A in MDA-MB-231 cells caused a change in cell morphology from spindle-like to rounded shape and formed cobblestone-like clusters.21 This is consistent with the previous report, that downregulation of JAM-A expression from epithelial cells using siRNA results in the change of epithelial cell morphology.15 This change in cell morphology by knockdown of JAM-A was attributed to the disruption of epithelial cell Apremilast barrier function.15 It was further shown that knockdown of Apremilast JAM-A affects epithelial cell morphology through reduction of 1integrin expression due to decreased Rap1 activity.15 Our observed effect of JAM-A downregulation in T47D cells, however, is not due to downregulation of 1integrin, since the level of this integrin was not affected in these cells. Interestingly, overexpression of JAM-A significantly affected both the cell migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells. Furthermore, knockdown of JAM-A using siRNA enhanced invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 cells, as well as T47D cells.21 The ability of JAM-A to attenuate cell invasion was found to be due to the formation of functional tight junctions as observed by distinct accumulation of JAM-A and ZO-1 at the TJs and Apremilast increased transepithelial resistance. These results identify, for the first time, a tight junctional cell adhesion protein as a key negative regulator of breast cancer cell migration and invasion.21 JAM-A has been shown to be important in maintaining TJ integrity.15,22C25 Disruption of TJs has been implicated to play a role in cancer cell metastasis by inducing epithelial mesenchymal transition.26 Several laboratories, including ours, have shown that cytokines and growth factors redistribute JAM-A from TJs.16,27,28 Consistent with this finding, it has been shown that hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) disrupts TJs in human breast cancer cells and downregulates expression of several TJ proteins.29 It is therefore conceivable that the loss of JAM-A in highly metastatic cells is a consequence of disruption of TJs. This was further supported by the findings that overexpression of JAM-A forms functional TJs in MDA-MB-231 cells and attenuates their migratory behavior. Our result is the first report correlating an inverse relationship of JAM-A expression in breast cancer cells to their invasive ability.21 Using cDNA microarray technology, it has been revealed how genes involved in cell-cell adhesion, including those of the TJ, are under or overexpressed in different carcinomas.15,30 Cell-cell adhesion molecules have been well documented to regulate cancer cell motility and invasion. Of the, the cadherin family members have been researched probably the most.31,32 It had been proposed a cadherin change, that is, the increased loss of E-cadherin and subsequent expression of N-cadherin, could be responsible for breasts tumor cell invasion.33,34 Even though the part of cadherins is well-documented, it continues to be controversial since some breasts tumor cell lines that usually do not communicate these protein still posses highly invasive features.33,34 However, the observed aftereffect of overexpression of JAM-A will not look like simply because of the formation of TJs, since individual cells that communicate increased JAM-A display reduced Rabbit Polyclonal to NDUFA3. migration.21 This isn’t surprising, since JAM-A furthermore to its function of regulating TJ integrity can be shown to take part in intracellular signaling. JAM-A is with the capacity of interacting aswell as heterotypically for the cell surface area homotypically.35,36 It has additionally been shown it interacts with several cytoplasmic proteins through its PDZ domain-binding motif and recruits signaling proteins in the TJs.37 Recent findings using site-directed mutagenesis claim that cis-dimerization of JAM-A is essential for this to handle its biological functions.38 Our very own observations claim that a JAM-A function-blocking antibody inhibits focal adhesion formation in endothelial cells (unpublished data), whereas overexpresion of JAM-A in MDA-MB-231 cells display steady and increased focal adhesions.21 It really is.

Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.